In winter 190/189 BCE near Magnesia ad Sipylum, a Roman–Pergamene army of about 30,000 faced Antiochus III’s larger host. Eumenes II shattered the Seleucid left; scythed chariots and elephants unraveled; Antiochus’ right surged but could not rescue a collapsing center. The coalition held the plain by nightfall [13][2][4][10][11].
What Happened
The plain near Magnesia ad Sipylum lies under Mount Sipylus, a rough gray mass overlooking the Hermus River. In December 190 or January 189 BCE, two armies arranged their logic there. On one side, Roman maniples and allied contingents under L. Scipio, with Eumenes II’s Pergamene cavalry anchoring a wing. On the other, Antiochus III’s great display: a phalanx center like a silver wall of sarissae, heavy cavalry on the flanks, scythed chariots and elephants interspersed for shock [13][2][4][10][11].
The morning was cold and bright. Standards flashed, and the roar of thousands settling into line rolled across the flat. Livy and Appian agree on the contest’s design: Eumenes’ strike on the Seleucid left triggered panic among the chariots; the elephants, balked and wounded, threw their crews and sowed confusion; the phalanx, rigid by design, could not flex to contain the contagion [2][4][13]. Spears clattered on shields; riders screamed to be heard over trumpeting.
Antiochus on the right did what great kings do: he attacked. His heavy cavalry tore through a Roman segment, threatened the camp, and for a moment seemed to unbalance the day. But his charge took him out of position to steady the center, and when the phalanx began to gap under missile fire and flanking pressure, there was no reserve with authority left to fill the holes [2][4][13].
Britannica’s synthesis gives the scale: c. 30,000 Roman–Pergamene troops by ancient reckoning against a larger Seleucid force, the latter’s weaknesses baked into a plan that overvalued shock and undervalued control [13]. The battlefield’s texture mattered. The open plain near Magnesia gave space for cavalry gambles but also for coordinated infantry rotations; the coalition used it to rotate maniples into fatigued gaps, something a pike wall cannot do once its order buckles [2][4][13].
By late day, the noise thinned. The Seleucid center lost formation; men bunched and ran toward the protection of camp ditches, then beyond. Eumenes’ horse harried a left that had ceased to be an army. Dust hung in the low sun like smoke, and the scarlet Roman standards moved forward in disciplined steps, no chase, only consolidation. The field belonged to the coalition [2][4][13].
Behind the lines, surgeons worked with cold hands; scribes counted captured banners. Along the Sardis road, the rumor moved faster than messengers: Antiochus had failed in the West. The gates that would open in 189 were already loosening on their hinges [2][13].
Why This Matters
Magnesia broke Seleucid power in western Asia Minor because it destroyed the king’s capacity to contest control on land. Antiochus’ right-wing success could not offset a left-wing rout and a collapsing phalanx. The coalition’s integrated tactics—Eumenes’ cavalry, Roman maniples, and disciplined pursuit—converted sea-borne momentum into a land decision [13][2][4].
The battle illuminates coalition leverage. Eumenes II’s attack authored the hinge of the fight; without Pergamene counsel and muscle, Rome’s design would have been poorer. The aftermath would repay that leverage in land—Hellespontic Phrygia, Lydia, and more—formalized in the postwar settlement [2][6][7].
Within the larger arc, Magnesia made negotiation unavoidable. The wave of surrenders that followed in 189 reflected not just fear but a rational calculus: without a field army and without a fleet, Antiochus could not protect clients west of Taurus. The clauses at Apamea would codify the defeat in geography, ships, elephants, and silver [1][3][12].
Event in Context
See what happened before and after this event in the timeline
People Involved
Key figures who played a role in Battle of Magnesia
Antiochus III the Great
Antiochus III (r. 222–187 BCE) restored the battered Seleucid Empire from Syria to the Iranian plateau and won decisive victories over rivals in the east and the Ptolemies in the south. His ambition to reenter the Aegean world, encouraged by Greek allies and Hannibal’s counsel, brought him into direct conflict with Rome. Defeated at sea in 190 BCE and crushed on land at Magnesia, he accepted the Treaty of Apamea (188), surrendering lands west of the Taurus, elephants, and his blue-water fleet, and giving hostages—including the future Antiochus IV. His fall ended Seleucid dominance in Asia Minor and opened the door to Pergamene and Rhodian ascendancy under Roman arbitration.
Lucius Cornelius Scipio (Asiaticus)
Lucius Cornelius Scipio, younger brother of Scipio Africanus, served as consul in 190 BCE and commanded the Roman army that crossed into Asia, defeated Antiochus III at Magnesia, and dictated peace at Sardis. Backed by his brother’s counsel and Pergamene and Rhodian allies, he fused coalition logistics with Roman infantry power to force the Treaty of Apamea (188). Granted the agnomen “Asiaticus,” he became the public face of Rome’s first great victory on the far side of the Aegean, the turning point that ended Seleucid rule west of the Taurus without Roman annexation.
Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus
Scipio Africanus, victor of Zama and Rome’s most celebrated general, returned to service in 190 BCE as senior legate to his brother Lucius. From the senate’s command arrangements to the Anatolian march, he shaped a coalition plan that paired Rhodian-Pergamene sea control with Roman infantry on land. Though ill during the Magnesia campaign, his diplomacy helped secure the Armistice at Sardis and the terms that became the Treaty of Apamea. His presence gave the coalition confidence—and gave Rome a template for projecting power east without annexation.
Eumenes II Soter
Eumenes II, king of Pergamon from 197 to 159 BCE, was Rome’s most effective Anatolian partner against Antiochus III. He furnished cavalry, intelligence, and diplomatic glue for the coalition, pressed the Roman advance into Lydia, and helped unhinge the Seleucid left at Magnesia. The Treaty of Apamea rewarded him with most lands west of the Taurus, catapulting Pergamon to regional preeminence. Builder, diplomat, and strategist, he turned one winter’s war into a Pergamene century under Roman protection.
Ask About This Event
Have questions about Battle of Magnesia? Get AI-powered insights based on the event details.