Back to Parthenon Construction
cultural

Construction of Athena Parthenos Advances under Pheidias

Date
-440
cultural

In 440–439 BCE, Pheidias advanced work on the chryselephantine Athena Parthenos—ivory and gold, 26 cubits tall. The statue’s removable gold, about forty talents, made devotion a financial instrument. In the half-light of the cella, a goddess took shape.

What Happened

The shell demanded a soul. Under Pheidias’ direction, workshops turned to the Athena Parthenos—a colossal statue of ivory and gold meant to command the cella’s center. Pausanias would later confirm the materials and details: the goddess made of ivory and gold, a small Nike perched in her hand, a serpent coiled nearby [5]. Pliny records the height—26 cubits, a measure that makes the naos’ volume intelligible [7].

The work was exacting. Ivory plates had to be prepared and joined over a wooden core; gold sheets hammered and fitted to shimmer under lamplight. The smell of oil and glue mingled with stone dust; the sound of fine tools—scrapers, burnishers—joined the worksite’s lower thrum. Pheidias balanced the aesthetic—dignity over spectacle—with the technical: differential expansion of materials, structural stability, and maintenance access [5].

Thucydides offers the political punchline: Pericles said the statue’s gold amounted to about forty talents and was detachable—removable in crisis, restorable in calmer times [9]. In one object, the city fused devotion and liquidity. The ivory skin would remain; the gold could become pay for sailors at the Piraeus or silver to calm a panic in the Agora. Faith became finance.

The figure’s iconography mattered, too. Athena Parthenos had a presence that resonated with the city’s self-image—armed yet composed, a protectress whose poise echoed the exterior’s Doric calm and the interior frieze’s civic procession [11]. Pheidias’ hands and those of his assistants translated that ideal into curves of a cheek, the fall of a peplos, the exact tilt of the Nike.

In practical terms, Pheidias had to coordinate with architects to ensure clearances and sightlines. Light sources were checked in all seasons; the statue’s reflective gold needed to catch but not blind. The azure wedge of daylight at the doors would strike high planes at noon; lamplight would gild edges at evening festival. Scarlet-dyed ropes kept curious workers at a respectful distance.

By the end of this phase, reports would have reached the Assembly: the goddess advances. The accounts did not list every stroke, but the city sensed the statue’s approach in new orders for metals, in the hush inside the cella, and in the way Pheidias’ workshop took on a new intensity. The building was about to become a house in fact, not just in name.

Why This Matters

Advancing the Athena Parthenos changed the Parthenon from a structure to a sanctuary. The statue’s material facts—ivory skin and about forty talents of removable gold—tied the building to the city’s fiscal strategy, making sacred wealth a deliberate instrument of statecraft [5][7][9]. The naos’ dimensions and light now had a purpose beyond geometry.

The event exemplifies “sacred wealth as statecraft.” Pericles’ claim, preserved by Thucydides, gives the statue a dual role: object of devotion and reserve asset [9]. Pheidias’ artistic choices were therefore also political, as he ensured the gold could be detached without disfiguring the goddess.

In the project’s arc, the statue’s progress created a deadline for interior fittings and focused finishing work on the cella. It also put pressure on the completion of the exterior sculptural program, so that dedication would not feel premature. The synergy between statue, frieze, and metopes intensified [11].

Scholars return to this phase because it binds aesthetics to economics in a way few monuments do. The Athena Parthenos is not just an artwork lost to time; it is a documented policy choice in three dimensions, confirmed by ancient witnesses [5][7][9].

Ask About This Event

Have questions about Construction of Athena Parthenos Advances under Pheidias? Get AI-powered insights based on the event details.

Answers are generated by AI based on the event content and may not be perfect.