Parthenon Construction — Timeline & Key Events
Between 447 and 432 BCE, Athens raced to raise the Parthenon—an 8-by-17-column Doric temple with an Ionic heart—under Pericles’ political cover, Pheidias’ oversight, and the architects Iktinos and Kallikrates .
Central Question
How did Athens convert tribute, artistry, and logistics into a single temple that projected power and doubled as a financial reserve—before war or politics could stop it?
The Story
A Goddess with a Bank Account
Athens built a savings account out of gold on a goddess. Per Thucydides, about forty talents of pure gold—fully removable—clad Athena Parthenos, ready to be taken down in crisis and restored when danger passed [9]. In one object, piety met liquidity.
Before 447 BCE, Athens had power and ambition but wanted a face to match both. Pericles, the city’s dominant statesman, imagined sacred buildings that would adorn Athens and advertise its leadership of Hellas, a program later praised—and criticized—for its splendor and speed [2][3]. Thucydides put it simply: even if emptied of people, Athens’ monumental fabric would make her seem twice as strong as she truly was [8].
Pericles Makes the Bet
Because a fiscal-religious reserve required a setting worthy of a goddess, Pericles launched the Acropolis works in 447 BCE, with the Parthenon as centerpiece [3][14][19]. He handed overall artistic oversight to Pheidias, a master sculptor, and appointed Iktinos and Kallikrates as architects—a triumvirate that gave politics, design, and execution equal weight [4][6].
Plutarch later marveled at what followed: works that rose with uncommon speed, completed within the span of a single administration [3]. Speed carried risk. But it generated momentum—political, religious, and visual—that critics would struggle to stall. Marble would do the rest.
Marble, Roads, and Accounts
After the leadership came the machine: stone, transport, payroll. The annual Parthenon accounts, inscribed year by year on stone (IG I³ 436–451), open with quarrying and road works in 447/6—hard evidence that Pentelic marble began moving early from Mount Pentelikon, roughly 17 kilometers away [1][13].
Boards of epistatai, the civic overseers, allocated funds and recorded outlays for columns, doors, metals, and sculptors with uncompromising granularity [1][10]. Imagine chalk-white dust in the air, oxen straining on graded tracks, the wooden squeal of cranes: logistics rendered sacred. The clarity of the accounts made waste visible—and progress undeniable.
A Doric Shell, Ionic Heart
Because the marble arrived and the books balanced, structure leapt skyward. The Parthenon’s peristyle locked into an exact grid: 8 columns on each short end, 17 along the flanks—Doric in muscle and measure [11]. The entablature followed, metope courses prepared, each a frame awaiting story [11][16].
Inside, the architects made a daring choice: a continuous Ionic frieze ran within the cella—a quiet ribbon of narrative inside a fortress of triglyphs [11]. Hammers struck a nervous rhythm; the stone rang; sun glanced off Pentelic crystals, dazzling white at noon, honeyed at dusk. The accounts, meanwhile, ticked through line items for doors and metal fittings as interior works advanced [1][10].
The Goddess Arrives
Because the shell now promised permanence, Pheidias advanced the heart of the enterprise: Athena Parthenos. She stood 26 cubits tall, ivory skin with gold adornments—articulate fingers, a small Nike resting in her hand, a serpent coiled nearby—details preserved by Pausanias and Pliny [5][7].
Around 438 BCE, the statue was dedicated, transforming an elegant structure into a functioning cult center [3][11]. The gold—about forty talents and detachable— made Pericles’ political point tangible: the city’s god could backstop the city’s war [9]. In the lamp-lit cella, ivory gleamed creamy-white; gold burned warm; oil smelled faint and sweet. The building now had a soul—and a reserve.
Battles at the Roofline
With the goddess in place, the stories had to speak. The exterior metopes took on Gigantomachy, Amazonomachy, and Centauromachy—mythic violence cut in shallow relief, sharpened by the high Attic sun [11][16]. Inside, the Ionic frieze advanced panel by panel, a continuous procession running like a heartbeat around the cella [11].
The same accounts that tracked stone and doors now list sculptors being paid for pediments by 438/7 BCE [1]. Those pediments—Birth of Athena on one end, Contest with Poseidon on the other—crowned the building with civic origin stories Pausanias later recorded [5]. Chisels rasped. Marble dust stung noses. Narrative hardened into stone.
Power Cast in Stone
As the last figures slid into place and interior fittings were finalized, the Parthenon’s program reached completion by 432 BCE—Plutarch’s “single administration” proved real in marble, payroll, and pace [3][11][19]. Because the overseers kept writing, we can still read the project breathing year by year on the accounts stelae [1][10].
Thucydides had predicted the effect: a deserted Athens would still look twice as powerful as it truly was [8]. The temple did more than house Athena—it fixed Athenian identity in stone and intertwined cult and cash, a reality also reflected in contemporary decrees about temple monies (IG I³ 52) [20]. The world took notice: from UNESCO’s modern valuation of the Periklean complex to ongoing restorations that still quarry Pentelic marble, the building remains a living system, its white stone catching the same Attic light [13][14].
Story Character
A democracy weaponizes beauty and finance
Key Story Elements
What defined this period?
Between 447 and 432 BCE, Athens raced to raise the Parthenon—an 8-by-17-column Doric temple with an Ionic heart—under Pericles’ political cover, Pheidias’ oversight, and the architects Iktinos and Kallikrates [3][4][11][19]. Annual stone-carved accounts track everything from quarry roads to sculptors’ wages, revealing a state machine that could move mountains, literally, from Mount Pentelikon to the Acropolis [1][13]. At the center stood Athena Parthenos, 26 cubits tall, clad in ivory and about forty talents of removable gold—art and emergency fund in one [5][7][9]. The result was not only a sanctuary but a statement: in Thucydides’ view, the city’s grandeur would make its power appear twice as great—an illusion built on exquisite engineering and meticulous finance [8].
Story Character
A democracy weaponizes beauty and finance
Thematic Threads
Sacred Wealth as Statecraft
Athena’s statue carried about forty talents of gold, engineered to be removable. This fused cult devotion with fiscal policy: a sanctuary as emergency fund. Pericles used it to argue resilience in war, while the temple’s magnificence legitimized the policy in the eyes of citizens and allies alike [9][2].
Accountability in Stone
The annual account inscriptions (IG I³ 436–451) turned a megaproject into transparent administration. Boards of epistatai tracked quarrying, transport, wages, doors, and sculptors. Public, legible finance created trust and discipline, enabling speed and scale without losing control of costs or quality [1][10].
Materials and Motion
From Mount Pentelikon to the Acropolis, c. 17 kilometers of prepared roads and lifting systems moved vast marble volumes. Early investment in quarrying and transport unlocked rapid structural assembly, while consistent material supply kept carvers and builders synchronized [13][1][17]. Logistics made architecture possible.
Architectural Synthesis
A Doric peripteral shell (8×17 columns) housed a continuous Ionic frieze inside the cella. Iktinos and Kallikrates blended orders to satisfy both structural clarity and narrative ambition, producing a canonical form whose coherence supported dense sculptural storytelling [11][4].
Image as Power Multiplier
Monumental fabric amplified Athenian prestige. As Thucydides observed, Athens’ appearance could double the perception of its power. The Parthenon’s scale, polish, and unified imagery projected stability and leadership across the Greek world, shaping diplomacy as much as devotion [8][14].
Quick Facts
Columns by the numbers
The Parthenon’s peristyle set 8 columns on each short end and 17 along the flanks—an 8×17 Doric grid that defined its muscular silhouette.
A 17 km haul
Pentelic marble traveled about 17 kilometers (10.6 miles) from Mount Pentelikon to the Acropolis, supported by prepared roads and crane handling.
Gold you could unbolt
Athena Parthenos carried about 40 talents of removable gold—roughly 1,040 kilograms—designed to be detached, used in crisis, and later restored.
How tall was Athena?
Pliny reports the statue at 26 cubits—about 11.5 meters (37–38 feet)—looming over the cella’s interior.
The payroll in stone
Annual building accounts (IG I³ 436–451) track payments for quarrying, transport, columns, doors, metals, and sculptors, including pedimental work by 438/7.
Who ran the show?
Plutarch names Pheidias as general overseer and Iktinos with Kallikrates as architects, a triad aligning art, design, and administration.
Ionic heart, Doric shell
A continuous Ionic frieze ran within the cella of a fundamentally Doric peripteral temple—an unusual blend for a canonical monument.
Tribute as throughput
Thucydides notes an annual phoros of about 600 talents to Athens—a fiscal backdrop that made monumental outlays and reserves conceivable.
Pediments tell origins
The pediments depicted the Birth of Athena and the Contest of Athena and Poseidon, themes later recorded by Pausanias.
Modern bones, ancient stone
Since 1975, restorations use Pentelic marble and titanium connectors with reversible methods—echoing ancient logistics with modern precision.
Artifacts abroad
Key portions of frieze, metopes, and pediment figures are exhibited in the British Museum’s Room 18, a focal point for ongoing debates.
Speed as policy
Plutarch stresses that the Periklean monuments were completed with unusual speed—“in the heyday of a single administration.”
Timeline Overview
Detailed Timeline
Showing 20 of 20 events
Filter Events
Toggle categories to show or hide
Pericles Launches Periklean Building Program
In 447 BCE, Pericles set Athens on an ambitious building program centered on the Acropolis, with the Parthenon as its flagship. Plutarch later called these works the city’s “most delightful adornment,” while their speed astonished contemporaries. The decision bound piety to politics and dared rivals to match marble with might.
Read MorePheidias Appointed Overseer; Iktinos and Kallikrates Named Architects
Pericles placed Pheidias in overall charge of the Parthenon and named Iktinos and Kallikrates as architects in 447 BCE. Plutarch preserves the chain of command; Vitruvius remembers Iktinos’ technical treatise. Wax tablets scraped, orders ran down the hill, and the Acropolis became a disciplined worksite.
Read MorePentelic Marble Quarrying and Road Works Begin
In 447/6 BCE, the Parthenon accounts record quarrying at Mount Pentelikon and road works to move marble the 17 km to the Acropolis. Oxen strained, sledges creaked, and the city engineered motion itself—stone in transit becoming policy on the hill.
Read MoreAcropolis Site Preparation and Foundations Laid
Crews leveled the Acropolis rock and set foundations in 447–446 BCE, fixing the Parthenon’s Doric footprint above Athens. Scarlet plumb lines hung still as chisels clicked; the plan 8 by 17 locked into stone. The hill became a geometry lesson with a sanctuary at its heart.
Read MoreCella Plan Set and Ionic Frieze Program Conceived
With the footprint secure by 446–445 BCE, Iktinos and Kallikrates fixed the interior: a grand cella and an unconventional continuous Ionic frieze inside a Doric shell. It was a bold synthesis, one Pheidias could turn into narrative stone.
Read MoreDoric Peristyle Columns Erected
By 445–444 BCE, the peristyle began to rise: 8 columns at each end, 17 along the flanks. Hoists creaked, drums turned in the light, and the white Pentelic shafts found their stance. The accounts list columns among major outlays—stone turned into standing order.
Read MoreEntablature and Metope Courses Installed
In 444–443 BCE, crews set the entablature and prepared the metope courses that would carry mythic battles. Triglyphs and metopes marched in sequence, a scaffolding for story. Hammers rang; the Attic sun cut bright edges into the new stone.
Read MoreSuperstructure and Roofing Works Advance
In 443–442 BCE, upper works and early roofing advanced as heavy marble members were lifted and aligned. Cranes groaned, ropes sang, and the temple began to close over its interior. Logistics talked back to design in every joint.
Read MoreCella Ionic Frieze Carving Begins
By 442–441 BCE, carvers set chisels to the interior Ionic frieze—a continuous procession within a Doric shell. A quiet rasp rose from the shaded cella as figures emerged in shallow relief, a heartbeat running around Athena’s house.
Read MoreDoors and Metal Fittings Procured per Accounts
In 441–440 BCE, the annual accounts record procurement of doors and metal fittings as interior works advanced. Hinges, clamps, and fastenings turned architecture into a working sanctuary. The ring of hammer on bronze echoed in the opisthodomos.
Read MoreConstruction of Athena Parthenos Advances under Pheidias
In 440–439 BCE, Pheidias advanced work on the chryselephantine Athena Parthenos—ivory and gold, 26 cubits tall. The statue’s removable gold, about forty talents, made devotion a financial instrument. In the half-light of the cella, a goddess took shape.
Read MoreDedication of Athena Parthenos
Around 438 BCE, Athens dedicated the Athena Parthenos inside the new temple. Ivory gleamed; gold burned warm; a small Nike rested in the goddess’s hand. Pericles’ claim—her gold was removable—now had weight you could see.
Read MorePedimental Sculptors Paid; Pediment Themes Defined
By 438/7 BCE, the building accounts record payments to sculptors on the pediments. Pausanias identifies the themes: the Birth of Athena and the Contest with Poseidon. The temple’s roofline prepared to tell Athens’ origin myths in marble.
Read MoreExterior Metopes Carved with Mythic Battles
In 437–436 BCE, sculptors advanced the metopes: Gigantomachy, Amazonomachy, Centauromachy. Shallow relief caught the high sun; battles ringed Athena’s house. The building’s outer skin turned conflict into civic clarity.
Read MoreIonic Frieze Installation Progresses
In 436–435 BCE, installation and finishing of the interior Ionic frieze continued. The procession turned corners, riders settled into rhythm, and the temple’s inner narrative neared completion. Inside the shade, a city met itself in stone.
Read MoreAnnual Accounts Inscription IG I³ 449 Records 434/3 Expenditures
In 434/3 BCE, the building accounts stele known as IG I³ 449 recorded ongoing expenditures, overseers, and works for the Parthenon. The chisel’s tick on stone made administration as public as the temple’s colonnade.
Read MoreFinal Interior Fittings and Architectural Refinements
In 434–433 BCE, epistatai oversaw final interior fittings and refinements—metals, doors, alignments—recorded in annual accounts. Small adjustments gave the Parthenon its calm. The click of latches and the whisper of planers replaced heavy lifts.
Read MoreCompletion of Sculptural Program and Temple
By 432 BCE, the Parthenon’s architecture and sculpture reached completion. Plutarch later marveled that the works finished “in the heyday of a single administration.” The marble sang in the Attic light; Athens had its argument in stone.
Read MoreBoards of Epistatai Oversee Works Annually
From 447 to 432 BCE, rotating boards of epistatai managed allocations and payments, posting annual accounts that tracked quarrying, transport, sculptors, and fittings. The project’s heartbeat was administrative—and audible in stone.
Read MoreMonumental Construction Shapes Athens’ Public Image
Between 447 and 432 BCE, the Parthenon’s rise reshaped how Athens looked—and how it was judged. Thucydides wrote that a deserted Athens would seem twice as powerful because of its buildings. Marble became a multiplier.
Read MoreKey Highlights
These pivotal moments showcase the most dramatic turns in Parthenon Construction, revealing the forces that pushed the era forward.
Pericles Launches Acropolis Program
In 447 BCE, Pericles initiated a coordinated building campaign with the Parthenon as centerpiece. Ancient authors frame it as a civic-religious project whose speed and ambition defined the High Classical moment [2][3][11][14][19].
Pheidias, Iktinos, Kallikrates Take Charge
Per Plutarch, Pheidias became general overseer while Iktinos and Kallikrates served as architects. Vitruvius preserves Iktinos’ authorship of a technical treatise on the temple [4][6].
Quarrying and Roads Commence
Accounts from 447/6 record marble extraction at Mount Pentelikon and road works to move blocks the 17 km to the Acropolis, launching the project’s supply chain [1][13].
Dedication of Athena Parthenos
Around 438 BCE, Athena Parthenos—ivory and gold, about 26 cubits high—was dedicated in the cella. Thucydides notes roughly 40 talents of removable gold [3][5][7][9][11].
Pedimental Sculptors on Payroll
By 438/7 BCE, the accounts record payments to pedimental sculptors. Pausanias identifies the themes: the Birth of Athena and the Contest of Athena and Poseidon [1][5].
IG I³ 449: The 434/3 Ledger
A dedicated stele (IG I³ 449) records ongoing expenditures, overseers, and works in 434/3, exemplifying the project’s public accountability [1][10].
Completion by 432 BCE
By 432 BCE, the Parthenon’s architecture and sculpture were complete. Plutarch underscores the exceptional speed and unity of execution [3][11][19].
Monuments Shape Public Image
Thucydides observed that Athens’ appearance would make its power seem twice as great; Plutarch called the temples the city’s adornment. The Parthenon crystallized this optics [8][2].
Key Figures
Learn about the influential people who played pivotal roles in Parthenon Construction.
Epistatai (Building Overseers)
The epistatai were annually appointed boards of Athenian citizens charged with supervising major public works, including the Parthenon. They awarded contracts, audited deliveries, approved wages, and published expenditures on stone stelai—state transparency made visible. In this timeline they knit together quarrying, sculpture, and assembly by enforcing schedules and standards, while ensuring that funds, including imperial tribute, were tracked. Their signatures on accounts turn the temple into both a financial instrument and a civic performance: every payment, from metal fittings to pedimental sculpture, passes through their hands.
Kallikrates
Kallikrates was a leading Athenian architect of the Periklean era, co-architect of the Parthenon and later designer of the graceful Temple of Athena Nike. On the Parthenon, he paired design intelligence with engineering pragmatism: sequencing lifts, coordinating clamp-and-dowel systems, and aligning roof and metal fittings with a relentlessly advancing schedule. He helped turn Pentelic marble and civic ambition into a disciplined workflow that kept sculptors, masons, and haulers moving in tandem. In this timeline he embodies the project’s logistical heartbeat, where elegant detailing meets industrial-scale organization.
Pheidias
Pheidias was Athens’ foremost sculptor, renowned for creating the chryselephantine Athena Parthenos and, at Olympia, the colossal Zeus—later counted among the Seven Wonders. As artistic overseer of the Parthenon, he united dozens of workshops and sculptors into a coherent program: a sweeping Ionic frieze, dramatic metopes, and measured pediments. He translated political ambition into visual theology, designing Athena’s removable gold as both sacred adornment and reserve fund. Targeted by lawsuits and envy, his reputation survived scandal. In this timeline he is the aesthetic nerve center, turning marble and gold into a city’s public face and financial instrument.
Iktinos
Iktinos was a 5th-century BCE Athenian architect best known as co-designer of the Parthenon and later credited with the temple of Apollo at Bassae. On the Acropolis he orchestrated the Parthenon’s strict Doric shell and its refined optical corrections—subtle curvature, column entasis, and precise corner solutions—while accommodating an Ionic frieze and colossal cult statue. He transformed political mandate into measured stone, ensuring elegance did not compromise speed. In this timeline he translates quarry deliveries and civic ambition into a mathematically tuned structure that reads as both sanctuary and manifesto.
Interpretation & Significance
Understanding the broader historical context and lasting impact of Parthenon Construction
Thematic weight
ACCOUNTS AS ARCHITECTURE
How inscriptions built a megaproject on schedule
The Parthenon’s most important stones may be its ledgers. Annual account inscriptions (IG I³ 436–451) made quarrying, transport, wages, and fittings publicly legible, under rotating boards of epistatai. This administrative transparency disciplined contractors and synchronized trades, creating a steady cadence from Pentelic quarry to Acropolis crane [1][10]. The records even capture sculptors’ payments by 438/7, letting us map creative labor to the build’s critical path in real time [1]. Plutarch’s astonishment at speed—works completed within a single administration—finds its mechanism here: logistics and finance as project control. Early investment in roads and heavy handling unlocked parallel workstreams, while documented allocations reduced friction among stakeholders [3][13]. The result was not just a temple but a governance prototype: stone that records money that moves stone, a feedback loop of accountability that made excellence reproducible.
MARBLE AS PROPAGANDA
Appearance as a force multiplier
Thucydides’ stark claim—that a deserted Athens would seem twice as powerful because of its buildings—elevates architecture to strategy. The Parthenon materialized this logic: its Doric shell signaled order; its continuous narratives framed civic identity; its polish projected resources under control [8][11]. Plutarch’s framing of Pericles’ program as the city’s “most delightful adornment” acknowledges the political optics: beauty leveraged for leadership [2][3]. The UNESCO designation recognizes this as a uniquely coherent fifth-century complex, but the ancient audience didn’t need a plaque—they had sightlines from the Piraeus to the Propylaia. The temple’s visibility stitched together devotion and diplomacy, making the Acropolis a permanent broadcast of stability and ambition, especially salient as the Peloponnesian War loomed [14][8].
SACRED WEALTH ENGINEERED
The detachable-gold logic of Athena Parthenos
Thucydides reports that Athena’s gold—about forty talents—was deliberately removable. This is financial engineering in religious form: a hedged reserve embedded in a cult statue, convertible in crisis and restorable afterward [9]. Pausanias confirms the chryselephantine materials, and Pliny’s height underscores the statue’s imposing presence in the cella—sacral authority backing fiscal credibility [5][7]. The mechanism made political arguments tangible. In decrees on temple monies, Athenians formalized obligations to the gods alongside civic finance, integrating sanctuaries into the city’s balance sheet [20]. The 438 BCE dedication thus completed a circuit: tribute funded marble, marble enframed gold, gold underwrote war risk. The goddess stood as both patron and guarantor—a theology of solvency.
DORIC MUSCLE, IONIC MEMORY
Blending orders to narrate a city
Under Iktinos and Kallikrates, the Parthenon married a Doric exterior to a continuous Ionic frieze in the cella. This was a structural-aesthetic choice that enabled uninterrupted narrative without sacrificing the Doric order’s disciplined massing [4][11]. Vitruvius’ notice of Iktinos’ technical treatise hints that this synthesis was theorized, not accidental—an architect’s argument in stone [6]. The program’s coherence—metopes of mythic combats, pedimental origins, interior procession—required such a blend. The Doric shell read as authority; the Ionic band read as civic memory, a procession encircling the goddess. The fusion let Athens claim both guardianship of tradition and mastery of innovation, embedding ideology into the orders themselves [11][16].
PENTELIKON TO ACROPOLIS
Logistics as the hidden masterpiece
The project’s pace began with roads. Accounts from 447/6 record quarrying and road works, the prerequisites for moving heavy Pentelic blocks roughly 17 km to the Acropolis [1]. Once material flow stabilized, cranes and coordinated crews turned finance into elevation—drums stacked, entablatures set, and spaces closed over for sculptural teams to work in shade and sequence [13]. Modern restoration has reenacted this material choreography: Pentelic marble is still sourced, lifted with precision, and joined—now with titanium—for reversibility and longevity [13][17]. Seeing the workflow today clarifies the original: speed was not haste but orchestration, a supply chain tuned to artistic deadlines and civic ceremonies. Logistics was the silent partner that made aesthetics inevitable.
Perspectives
How we know what we know—and what people at the time noticed
INTERPRETATIONS
Temple as statecraft engine
The Parthenon reads as a calculated fusion of cult and policy: a sanctuary whose splendor legitimated Athenian leadership while stabilizing finances through the removable gold of the Athena Parthenos. Pericles’ program positioned architecture to perform both piety and deterrence—sacred wealth on display that could be redeployed in crisis [2][9][14].
DEBATES
Speed: efficiency or politics?
Plutarch’s praise of unprecedented speed invites debate: was the pace primarily technical proficiency or political urgency to lock in achievements before opposition could mobilize? The accounts suggest disciplined logistics and oversight, but Thucydides’ emphasis on appearance implies a political premium on finishing quickly to maximize image and influence [1][3][8].
CONFLICT
Granite budgets vs. golden ideals
The stone-carved accounts expose tension between idealized narratives and real costs—wages, metals, doors, transport. The project’s ideology promised timeless beauty; the ledgers show a tight managerial regime translating tribute into line items, demonstrating how a democratic city made the sublime accountable in public records [1][10][2].
HISTORIOGRAPHY
Who tells the Parthenon?
Our picture leans on genre-diverse voices: Plutarch for appointments and pace; Thucydides for power-as-appearance and fiscal reserves; Pausanias for iconography; Pliny and Vitruvius for measurements and technical attributions. Each preserves a different facet, and together with inscriptions they triangulate a rare, well-documented ancient build [3][4][5][6][7][8].
WITH HINDSIGHT
Restoration as laboratory
Modern anastylosis on the Acropolis—Pentelic marble, titanium dowels, methodical reversibility—mirrors ancient logistics in contemporary form. Seeing cranes and marble moving today clarifies how early investment in roads and handling once drove the project’s speed; conservation becomes a window onto the original construction machine [13][17][1].
SOURCES AND BIAS
Inscriptions versus memory
The building accounts are contemporaneous, public, and procedural; literary testimonies arrive centuries later, often moralizing (Plutarch) or analytical (Thucydides). Where inscriptions fix payments to pedimental sculptors by 438/7, Pausanias’ later descriptions supply subjects and attributes—complementary but uneven. Cross-reading reduces genre bias and closes gaps [1][5][3][10].
Sources & References
The following sources were consulted in researching Parthenon Construction. Click any reference to visit the source.
Ask Questions
Have questions about Parthenon Construction? Ask our AI-powered history tutor for insights based on the timeline content.