Back to Trajan
legal

Pliny–Trajan Rescripts on Christians in Bithynia

Date
112
Part of
Trajan
legal

Around 112 CE, Pliny asked Trajan how to try Christians in Bithynia. “Do not seek them out,” the emperor replied; punish upon legal conviction; accept repentance; reject anonymous libelli. The policy sounded like law, not panic [1][7].

What Happened

Not all governance clangs. In Bithynia, a prosperous province along the Black Sea, the provincial governor, Pliny the Younger, wrote to Trajan about a puzzle: how to handle trials of people called Christians. His letter begins with bureaucratic candor—“It is my practice, my lord, to refer to you all matters concerning which I am in doubt”—and then lists practical questions: Is mere name enough? Should age matter? What if they recant? [1].

The reply from Rome is crisp. Trajan instructs him: do not seek them out; if accused and convicted under proper procedure, punish; if they deny and prove it by sacrificing to the Roman gods, pardon; and do not accept anonymous accusations (libelli) because they are unworthy of a civilized administration [1]. Eusebius, writing later, summarizes the gist: Trajan forbids Christians to be sought after [7].

The policy is procedural, not theological. It turns on evidence and public acts, not secret beliefs. In Nicomedia’s courts, the sound becomes the steady murmur of hearings, not the mob’s shout. The color is bureaucratic—ink-black letters across pale wax tablets—rather than the scarlet of soldiers. Law directs fear into channels the state can defend.

The places in play form a triangle. Nicomedia in Bithynia, where Pliny tested practice; Rome, where the emperor framed policy; and cities across Asia Minor where guilds, temples, and governors would take their cues. The decision integrated a periphery with the capital’s logic in the same way roads and bridges integrated frontiers with the army’s logistics.

The rescripts also exemplify a broader Trajanic method. The same ruler who cut a road through the Iron Gates relied on letters to cut through confusion. The reduction of complexity into clear Latin—don’t hunt, do punish upon conviction, reject anonymous slander—is the administrative counterpart to the Column’s base inscription measuring a hill’s removal [1][4].

Pliny’s exchange stands as a rare window where we can hear the empire think. No edict thunders; a measured voice answers specifics. The Christians remain suspect; the state remains cautious. But the mechanism is visible—and teachable. Other governors could copy it like they copied military drill.

Why This Matters

Trajan’s rescripts gave provincial governors a template for handling Christians without unleashing indiscriminate persecution. It bound trials to evidence and public sacrifice, and it closed the door to anonymous denunciations, curbing opportunistic cruelty [1][7].

The event highlights law as instrument. It shows a regime whose identity—spelled out on coins as OPTIMO PRINCIPI—rested on predictability as much as power. The same state that engineered bridges engineered rules to manage dissent without losing its legal face [14].

In the larger narrative, the rescripts are a counterpoint to campaigns. While legions marched toward Armenia and Mesopotamia, Rome’s center worked to regularize practice in the provinces. That administrative coherence made the empire governable even at its widest reach [3][17].

Ask About This Event

Have questions about Pliny–Trajan Rescripts on Christians in Bithynia? Get AI-powered insights based on the event details.

Answers are generated by AI based on the event content and may not be perfect.