Roman Expansion into Hispania — Timeline & Key Events

Hispania entered Rome’s story as a crisis, not a plan: Hannibal’s eight‑month siege of Saguntum south of the Ebro forced the Republic to act, and fast.

-218-19
Iberian Peninsula
199 years

Central Question

Could Rome turn a rushed intervention against Hannibal into lasting rule over a rugged peninsula that kept producing new enemies, new tactics, and new temptations?

The Story

A city south of the Ebro

The spark was a city with walls the color of sun‑baked clay. In 219–218 BCE, Hannibal Barca, Carthage’s young commander in Iberia, ringed Saguntum—Rome’s ally south of the Ebro—with rams and ladders, and after eight months of shouting horns, broken stone, and house‑to‑house killing, took it by storm [1].

Saguntum’s fall shattered the compromise of the Ebro treaty. Rome, unwilling to let Carthage keep a bridgehead into Italy, landed troops in northeastern Iberia in 218 BCE, won at Cissa, and seized the wind‑beaten coast north of the Ebro to sever Hannibal’s reinforcement route [12]. A quick fix had become a new front.

Scipio’s audacity, Spain’s hinge

Because Saguntum fell, the Republic needed a commander who would not just react. In 210 BCE Publius Cornelius Scipio—barely thirty, not yet consul—took Spain with a gambler’s calm and a quartermaster’s brain. He chose the nerve center: New Carthage on a salt lagoon, the Barcid arsenal [12].

At dawn in 209 BCE, with sea mist low and shields wet, Scipio hit the city fast, scaling walls while a hidden tidal flat let Romans surge where defenders didn’t expect. New Carthage fell. Carthage’s command web in Iberia snapped; its magazines, hostages, and silver belonged to Rome [12]. Momentum shifted—and quickened.

Ilipa ends Punic Spain

That momentum set up the duel at Baecula in 208 BCE: Scipio smashed Hasdrubal Barca, though the Carthaginian slipped off to Italy like smoke on a windy ridge [12]. The real decision came two years later.

In 206 BCE near Ilipa, scarlet and gold standards rolled forward under a sun that glared off helmets. Scipio inverted the expected order of his lines and broke Hasdrubal Gisco and Mago’s coalition frontally and in the flanks [11]. Carthage evacuated Spain. Rome moved from beachhead to landlord of the coast and the south [11][12]. But the interior had not consented.

Viriathus teaches Rome to bleed

But expelling Carthage solved only the coast. In the 150s BCE, a Roman commander, Servius Sulpicius Galba, summoned Lusitanians with promises, then penned them in a ditch and cut them down—treachery screamed across valleys like a bad oath [3]. Out of that wound stepped Viriathus.

From 155 to 139 BCE, the hunter of the Serra da Estrela turned the hills into a weapon. He lured, vanished, struck supply lines, and humiliated commanders who marched in straight lines on crooked ground [3]. The war ended not in battle but in betrayal: assassins crept into a tent, and Viriathus fell. Rome learned a harsh lesson—attrition in Spain did not end with a trumpet blast.

Numantia: discipline over disgrace

The Lusitanian war had taught pain; in Celtiberia the lesson deepened. In 137 BCE, the consul Gaius Hostilius Mancinus signed a treaty under duress with Numantia that Appian called “most ignominious.” The Senate refused to ratify it, staining Rome’s honor and resolve [4].

Rome answered with a specialist in hard work: Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus. In 134–133 BCE he ringed Numantia with ditches, towers, and palisades, cut food like a tourniquet, and starved the city into surrender. The smoke that rose in 133 was final; Numantia’s destruction ended a symbol and proved that system—discipline, siegecraft, logistics—could beat valor [4].

Law, roads, and the long reach

After the sieges came governance. Even before the last highlands bowed, Roman law seeped into the interior. In 87 BCE, the Tabula Contrebiensis recorded a Roman‑supervised arbitration among Celtiberian communities—Latin letters on bronze showing how disputes now traveled through Roman magistrates [9].

Strabo’s geography explains why form followed terrain: the south, fertile and rivered, took towns and plows; the north, cold and jagged, bred fighters and delays [10]. So Rome laid roads and planted colonies, linking Tarraco to Corduba, the sea to the meseta [12]. Power here wasn’t just legions. It was paperwork, milestones, and stone‑paved miles.

Augustus takes the hard north

Yet one blank patch remained: the Cantabrian and Asturian ranges. Starting in 29 BCE, Augustus, now sole ruler, treated them as Rome’s last Western war. He came in person, fell ill at Tarraco’s sea breezes, and delegated to Gaius Antistius and Carisius, who took places like Lancia one by one [6].

Orosius counts roughly five years of grinding columns, betrayals, and sieges before the emperor could close Janus’ doors and say peace held, Spain included [7]. Florus called these the final embers in the West [5]. The silence that followed smelled of wet granite and pine—and a door of bronze shut with a public thud.

From war zone to Roman Spain

With the Cantabri and Astures beaten, the map hardened. In 27 BCE Augustus had already sliced Hispania into Baetica, Lusitania, and Tarraconensis, fixing capitals at Corduba, Augusta Emerita, and Tarraco, and tying them with roads that channeled taxes, recruits, and news [12]. Veterans settled at Augusta Emerita in 25 BCE made permanence visible in tile and theater [6][12].

The payoff was material as well as political. Pliny later tallied 20,000 Roman pounds of gold each year from Asturia, Gallaecia, and Lusitania—streams panned, shafts sunk, and mountain flanks collapsed by water in ruina montium [8]. At Las Médulas, 32 canals ran for over 800 kilometers to 39 reservoirs, an industrial landscape gouged into red rock [13][15]. Livy saw the arc: first to enter, last to finish—Spain fully reduced only in Augustus’ age [2]. Augustus’ own Res Gestae made the boast imperial policy made real [16].

Story Character

A coastal foothold becomes an empire

Key Story Elements

What defined this period?

Hispania entered Rome’s story as a crisis, not a plan: Hannibal’s eight‑month siege of Saguntum south of the Ebro forced the Republic to act, and fast. Rome’s counterstroke—Scipio Africanus storming New Carthage, winning at Baecula and Ilipa—drove Carthage off the map. But ejecting one empire only exposed the interior’s resolve: Viriathus’ guerrillas, then Numantia’s stoic siege, taught Rome that Spain would not be taken by set‑piece battles alone. A generation later, Augustus absorbed the cost and the lesson. He fought the last Western wars against the Cantabri and Astures, closed Janus’ gates, founded Augusta Emerita for veterans, and reorganized the peninsula into Baetica, Lusitania, and Tarraconensis. From crisis to consolidation, Hispania became a Roman engine—of law, roads, soldiers, oil, silver, and, above all, gold.

Story Character

A coastal foothold becomes an empire

Thematic Threads

From Beachhead to Interior Control

Rome seized the coast to cut Hannibal’s supply line, then faced the harder task of subduing upland societies. Coastal victories at New Carthage and Ilipa removed Carthage [11][12], but Viriathus and Numantia proved interior conquest required different tools. The sequence explains why fast offensives became slow sieges and governance.

Guerrilla Warfare vs. Roman Adaptation

Lusitanian and Celtiberian tactics—ambush, mobility, local supply—bled legions. Rome adapted with treachery’s backlash, then with discipline and encirclement under Scipio Aemilianus at Numantia [3][4]. The mechanism was institutional: training, logistics, and siege engineering turned tactical frustration into strategic success.

Administration as a Weapon

Legal arbitration, provincial division, and colonies projected control beyond battlefield lines. The Tabula Contrebiensis shows Roman law arbitrating local disputes [9]; Augustus’ tripartite reorganization with capitals and roads enabled taxation and recruitment [12]. Paper, milestones, and veterans stabilized conquest into rule.

Terrain Shapes Strategy and Economy

Strabo’s contrast—fertile south, inhospitable north—mapped onto campaign difficulty and economic payoff [10]. Easy grain and olive basins turned into cities; hard mountains demanded prolonged war but hid gold. The same ranges that slowed legions later fed imperial finances through engineered mining systems [8][13][15].

The Augustan Peace as Policy

Augustus used personal command, veteran settlement, ritual closure of Janus, and administrative reform to bind the northwest [6][7][12]. The mechanism fused military grind with public symbolism and colonization, converting the last Western resistance into a durable provincial order recognized in his Res Gestae [16].

Quick Facts

Eight-month spark

Saguntum fell after an eight-month siege (219–218 BCE), giving Rome a casus belli and opening the Iberian theater of the Second Punic War.

Gold by the ton

Pliny reports 20,000 Roman pounds (librae) of gold annually from Asturia, Gallaecia, and Lusitania—about 6,540 kg (6.54 metric tons) per year.

Mountains undone by water

At Las Médulas, researchers mapped 32 canals totaling over 800 km (about 497 miles) and 39 reservoirs feeding ruina montium hydraulic mining.

A city in a day

Scipio stormed New Carthage in 209 BCE, seizing hostages and silver in a single, audacious assault that cracked Carthage’s Iberian command.

Ilipa ends Punic Spain

Scipio’s 206 BCE victory over Hasdrubal Gisco and Mago at Ilipa forced a Carthaginian evacuation of Hispania and shifted control to Rome.

A treaty disowned

Appian calls Mancinus’ 137 BCE pact with Numantia “most ignominious”; the Senate refused to ratify it, reversing a battlefield humiliation.

Emperor at Tarraco

Augustus personally directed the Cantabrian–Asturian campaigns, fell ill at Tarraco, and relied on legates like Gaius Antistius and Carisius to continue sieges.

Lancia falls

The Asturian stronghold of Lancia was captured by the Augustan legate Carisius around 25 BCE, tightening Rome’s hold on the northwest.

Peace by bronze doors

After roughly five years of Cantabrian war, Augustus closed the Gates of Janus in Rome, a public sign that Spain (and the empire) was at peace.

Law on bronze

The Tabula Contrebiensis (87 BCE) records Roman-supervised arbitration among Iberian communities, showing legal integration before full military pacification.

Three provinces, three hubs

Augustus reorganized Hispania into Baetica, Lusitania, and Tarraconensis with centers at Corduba, Augusta Emerita, and Tarraco, tied by roads for taxes and recruits.

Last to submit

Livy notes that although Rome entered Spain early, it was the last continental region fully reduced—only under Augustus’ leadership.

Timeline Overview

-218
-19
Military
Political
Diplomatic
Economic
Cultural
Crisis
Legal
Administrative
Hover over dots to preview events • Click to jump to detailed view

Detailed Timeline

Showing 5 of 5 events

Filter Events

Toggle categories to show or hide

-219
Military
Military

Siege and Sack of Saguntum

In 219–218 BCE, Hannibal besieged Rome’s ally Saguntum, a walled city south of the Ebro, and took it by storm after eight months. Bronze rams pounded clay‑colored walls as horns blared and house‑to‑house fighting ended in a final rush. The sack shattered the Ebro treaty balance and forced Rome into Iberia to block Hannibal’s road to Italy.

Read More
-218
Military
Military

Battle of Cissa

In 218 BCE, Roman forces struck at Cissa on the Catalan coast, beating Carthaginian troops and securing the shoreline north of the Ebro. The win turned Tarraco and Emporion into anchors, and the crash of shields along the surf meant Hannibal’s Spanish reinforcements now faced a naval and land cordon.

Read More
-210
Military
Military

Scipio Assumes Command in Hispania

In 210 BCE, Publius Cornelius Scipio took over the Spanish theater and married audacity to supply, aiming straight at Carthage’s nerve centers. From Tarraco to the lagoon of New Carthage, he planned to cut command cables, not just win set‑piece fights—and to do it in months, not years.

Read More
-209
Military
Military

Storming of New Carthage (Cartago Nova)

In 209 BCE, Scipio stormed New Carthage, the Barcid arsenal on a salt lagoon—seizing hostages, silver, and the city in a single day. The clash of ladders on stone and the surge over a tidal flat broke Carthage’s command web in Iberia and gave Rome momentum that would carry to Ilipa.

Read More
-208
Military
Military

Battle of Baecula

In 208 BCE near Baecula in the upper Guadalquivir, Scipio beat Hasdrubal Barca and blunted Carthaginian hopes in Spain. Under a hard sun, Roman lines climbed broken ridges; Hasdrubal slipped away toward Italy, but the clash tightened Rome’s grip on Baetica and set up Ilipa.

Read More

Key Highlights

These pivotal moments showcase the most dramatic turns in Roman Expansion into Hispania, revealing the forces that pushed the era forward.

Casus Belli
-219

Saguntum Falls: War Triggered in Iberia

Hannibal besieged and stormed Rome’s ally Saguntum after eight months (219–218 BCE), violating understandings tied to the Ebro treaty and daring Rome to respond.

Why It Matters
Saguntum transformed Barcid consolidation into a Roman crisis. By attacking south of the Ebro, Hannibal forced Rome to project power onto the Iberian coast, opening a new theater whose outcomes would reshape Mediterranean hegemony. The fall set in motion Rome’s strategy to sever Hannibal’s reinforcement routes and drew the Republic into a century-long Iberian entanglement.Immediate Impact: Rome landed forces in northeastern Iberia in 218 BCE, won at Cissa, and secured the coast north of the Ebro to block Carthaginian reinforcement paths to Italy.
Explore Event
Strategic Victory
-209

New Carthage Stormed: Nerve Center Seized

Scipio captured New Carthage in a rapid assault, taking hostages, silver, and the Barcid arsenal in 209 BCE and snapping Carthaginian command in Iberia.

Why It Matters
By decapitating Carthage’s Iberian logistics and leadership, Rome seized initiative. The fall of the arsenal removed the enemy’s operational flexibility and set conditions for successive Roman victories that would push Carthage out of Spain entirely. It showcased a doctrine of striking command nodes rather than grinding out attrition.Immediate Impact: Carthaginian forces operated with fractured coordination, enabling Scipio to win at Baecula and prepare for the decisive Ilipa.
Explore Event
Decisive Battle
-206

Ilipa: Punic Power Broken

Scipio crushed Hasdrubal Gisco and Mago at Ilipa, using a reversed battle order to rout the Punic coalition and end Carthaginian power in Spain.

Why It Matters
Ilipa closed the Punic chapter and opened Rome’s. With Carthage evacuating, Rome became master of the coast and south, freeing resources and attention to confront interior resistance. The battle also cemented Scipio’s reputation and validated aggressive operational design.Immediate Impact: Carthaginian commanders withdrew from Hispania; Roman control spread across key southern and coastal zones.
Explore Event
Atrocity
-150

Galba’s Treachery: War Ignites

Servius Sulpicius Galba lured surrendered Lusitanians into a ditch and massacred them in the 150s BCE, a brutality Appian condemns.

Why It Matters
The atrocity delegitimized Roman promises and catalyzed Viriathus’s insurgency. It revealed the political cost of treachery: short-term ‘victory’ created long-term guerrilla war that tied down legions and forced Rome to adapt beyond conventional set-piece tactics.Immediate Impact: Viriathus emerged as a leader (155–139 BCE), repeatedly outmaneuvering Roman commanders until his assassination ended the war.
Explore Event
Siege
-134

Numantia: Siegecraft Over Valor

Scipio Aemilianus starved Numantia into surrender (134–133 BCE) and destroyed the city, ending a symbol of Celtiberian resistance.

Why It Matters
Numantia proved that logistics, discipline, and encirclement—not heroic charges—would win Spain’s interior. It restored Roman credibility after the Mancinus fiasco and provided a template for later operations in difficult terrain.Immediate Impact: Celtiberian resistance fragmented; Rome tightened control through fortified lines and administrative inroads into the interior.
Explore Event
Administrative Reform
-27

Three Provinces: A Map Hardens

Augustus reorganized Hispania into Baetica, Lusitania, and Tarraconensis (27 BCE), with administrative hubs at Corduba, Augusta Emerita, and Tarraco.

Why It Matters
The tripartite framework transformed conquest into durable rule. By pairing capitals, colonies, and roads, Augustus created predictable channels for taxation, recruitment, and legal oversight—turning rugged regions into governable units and embedding Spain within imperial systems.Immediate Impact: Provincial administration standardized; road building and coloniae accelerated integration and revenue extraction.
Explore Event
Colony Foundation
-25

Augusta Emerita: Veterans to City

Augustus settled veterans at Augusta Emerita (25 BCE), a colony that became the capital of Lusitania and a linchpin of Roman presence in the west.

Why It Matters
Veteran colonies locked military gains into civic realities—land grants, theaters, forums, and grids. Emerita anchored administration, secured routes, and spread Roman law and culture, exemplifying how settlement underwrote pacification.Immediate Impact: A permanent Roman urban center secured the Guadiana corridor and supported ongoing campaigns and administration in the northwest.
Explore Event
Campaign Conclusion
-19

Cantabrian–Asturian Wars End

By 19 BCE, Roman forces suppressed organized resistance in the northwest after multi-year campaigns coordinated by Augustus and his legates.

Why It Matters
This was Rome’s last Western war, completing the conquest of the peninsula. It allowed Augustus to stage peace—closing Janus’ Gates—and to rely on colonies and administration rather than constant campaigning to hold the region.Immediate Impact: Insurgency ceased; symbolic closure of Janus and consolidation of provincial governance followed.
Explore Event

Interpretation & Significance

Understanding the broader historical context and lasting impact of Roman Expansion into Hispania

Thematic weight

From Beachhead to Interior ControlGuerrilla Warfare vs. Roman AdaptationAdministration as a WeaponTerrain Shapes Strategy and EconomyThe Augustan Peace as Policy

WAR AS POLICY

From Saguntum’s crisis to an Augustan blueprint

Rome did not plan Iberia; Saguntum forced it. Hannibal’s eight-month siege of a Roman ally south of the Ebro ruptured a delicate balance and compelled a coastal intervention meant to strangle reinforcement routes to Italy [1][12]. Scipio’s capture of New Carthage redefined the campaign as one of nodal decapitation: seize the Barcid arsenal, hostages, and silver, and the Punic web collapses [12]. Ilipa made the exit official; Carthage evacuated Spain [11][12].

What followed was not withdrawal but redefinition. Having inherited the coast and south, Rome confronted an interior war that tactics alone could not solve. The disciplined siege of Numantia answered the disgrace of Mancinus’ repudiated treaty, turning logistics and encirclement into doctrine [4]. Under Augustus, this doctrinal learning fused with statecraft: personal command, legates in the field, and the staging of peace via the Gates of Janus [6][7]. The provincial reorganization into Baetica, Lusitania, and Tarraconensis converted conquest into governance—a blueprint of roads, colonies, and law that made the peninsula a durable engine for the empire [12][17].

MOUNTAINS WRITE THE SCRIPT

How Iberia’s geography dictated Rome’s methods

Strabo’s contrast is blunt: the north is cold and inhospitable; the south is fertile [10]. The south yielded towns, grain, and quick operational payoffs—Carthage’s expulsion happened in accessible river basins and coastal corridors [11][12]. In the north, Lusitanian and Celtiberian fighters turned broken ridgelines and forests into weapons. Ambush, evasion, and local supply chains made legions pay by the march, not just in battle [3][4].

Rome adapted by shifting from decisive field engagements to methodical encirclement and attrition. Numantia’s fall via a ring of trenches and towers previewed Augustan practice against the Cantabri and Astures—multi-column advances, targeted sieges like Lancia, and relentless pressure despite imperial illness at Tarraco [4][6]. The terrain extended the war’s timeline but not its logic: control the valleys, cut the passes, starve the highlands, then plant roads and colonies to keep them quiet [6][10][12].

EXTRACTION BUILT TO LAST

Gold, law, and roads as the scaffolding of empire

Pliny’s line item—20,000 librae of gold per year—turns Spain’s northwest into a fiscal argument for conquest [8]. That output depended on ruina montium, a hydraulic technology visible at Las Médulas: 32 canals extending over 800 km and 39 reservoirs moving water like moving armies [13][15]. The mines’ scale explains why frontier fighting was worth finishing; extraction paid the annona and the legions.

But extraction alone doesn’t secure provinces—institutions do. The Tabula Contrebiensis shows Roman arbitration formalizing local disputes decades before the last campaigns, a legal seepage that preceded garrisons [9]. Augustan division into Baetica, Lusitania, and Tarraconensis, mapped later in dense road networks, provided the administrative mesh for taxation and recruitment [12][17]. The mechanism is cumulative: law smooths governance, roads move value, and gold justifies the cost.

WHOSE SPAIN?

Imperial storytelling and indigenous erasures

Ancient narratives cast Spain as a stage for Roman virtue and Augustan order. Livy’s conclusion—that Spain was reduced only under Augustus—frames centuries of conflict as a prologue to imperial peace [2]. Florus compresses the Cantabrian and Asturian wars into the ‘last Western embers,’ and Orosius moralizes the closure of the Gates of Janus as a providential outcome [5][7]. Cassius Dio centers the emperor’s presence and illness at Tarraco, highlighting imperial agency [6].

Yet the people doing most of the fighting rarely speak. Appian preserves Lusitanian suffering under Galba and the reputation of Viriathus, but even these are filtered through Roman pens [3]. Indigenous legal voices surface fleetingly in inscriptions like the Tabula Contrebiensis, and Strabo’s geography surveys without conceding local subjectivity [9][10]. Historiography thus enshrines Augustan achievement while leaving Lusitanian and Celtiberian experiences largely archaeological.

PEACE YOU CAN SEE

Ritual closure, veteran cities, administrative lines

Augustus understood that victories fade unless they are built over. The closing of Janus’ Gates turned a tactical grind into a public theology of peace; his Res Gestae immortalized the claim [7][16]. Founding Augusta Emerita for veterans linked the battlefield to the forum: theaters, tiles, and grids made victory walkable [6][12]. Ritual and masonry worked together to make pacification legible.

Administrative lines then made it durable. The 27 BCE tripartite division—with hubs at Corduba, Augusta Emerita, and Tarraco—plugged Hispania into imperial circuits of taxation, recruitment, and law [12]. Roads mapped authority into distances; later cartography shows these arteries thickening [17]. The result wasn’t just the end of resistance in 19 BCE—it was the beginning of Roman Spain as a system.

Perspectives

How we know what we know—and what people at the time noticed

INTERPRETATIONS

Defense or extraction?

Rome’s move into Hispania began as a strategic response to Saguntum and the Ebro treaty, aiming to block Hannibal’s reinforcements to Italy [1][12]. Yet hindsight highlights economic gravity: Pliny’s 20,000 Roman pounds of annual gold from Asturia, Gallaecia, and Lusitania, and the vast hydraulic systems at Las Médulas, show a resource engine that rewarded staying power [8][13][15]. Defensive urgency evolved into an imperial commitment sustained by extraction.

DEBATES

Viriathus: bandit or general?

Appian presents Viriathus as a formidable guerrilla leader born from Roman treachery under Galba, repeatedly outmaneuvering consuls before assassination ended the war [3]. Modern syntheses situate him within broader Lusitanian resistance rather than anachronistic nationalism, but the debate persists over whether Rome faced ‘banditry’ or organized counter-state warfare in rugged terrain [12].

CONFLICT

Guerrillas vs. legions

Lusitanian and Celtiberian tactics—ambush, dispersion, intimate knowledge of ridgelines—bled Roman columns that were optimized for open battle [3][4]. Rome adapted by pairing punitive mobility with encirclement and supply strangulation, seen at Numantia and later in Augustan sieges; terrain and weather in the north magnified the cost of every mile [4][6][10].

HISTORIOGRAPHY

Spain through Augustan eyes

Livy’s retrospective that Spain was ‘last reduced’ under Augustus frames the narrative as a teleology toward imperial order [2]. Florus amplifies this as the ‘last Western resistance’ [5], Orosius links it to Janus’ closing and providential peace [7], and Cassius Dio centers the emperor’s personal role [6]. The literary arc privileges Augustan triumph and compresses indigenous perspectives.

WITH HINDSIGHT

Mining explains persistence

The sheer scale of Spanish gold—Pliny’s 20,000 librae annually—paired with engineered waterworks at Las Médulas (32 canals, 800+ km; 39 reservoirs) reframes why Rome absorbed the human and fiscal cost of the northwest [8][13][15]. What began as a Punic war theater matured into a core revenue province whose mines, roads, and cities made the conquest pay dividends [12].

SOURCES AND BIAS

Celtiberian silence

Our narrative leans on Roman and Greek authors—Polybius, Livy, Appian, Dio—whose agendas range from moralizing to imperial legitimation [1][2][4][6]. Indigenous voices survive mostly in material culture and scant inscriptions; the Tabula Contrebiensis is a rare window into local legal practice under Roman oversight, while Strabo’s geography filters Iberia through Mediterranean eyes [9][10].

Sources & References

The following sources were consulted in researching Roman Expansion into Hispania. Click any reference to visit the source.

Ask Questions

Have questions about Roman Expansion into Hispania? Ask our AI-powered history tutor for insights based on the timeline content.

Answers are generated by AI based on the timeline content and may not be perfect. Always verify important information.