After the 464 BCE quake, helots and Messenians fortified Mount Ithome, forming a rebel citadel. Plutarch says the rising put Sparta in “the greatest peril,” while Pausanias fixes Ithome as the siege’s heart. The mountain made revolt durable.
What Happened
Ithome rises like a crouched lion above the Messenian plain, its flanks cut by gullies and its summit broad enough for a town’s worth of walls. After the earthquake, rebels climbed it with sacks of barley, skins of water, and the expertise passed down from Eira’s defenders. Within weeks, parapets appeared; paths were trapped; lookouts scanned the Pamisos and the roads to Andania and Stenyclerus [2][4].
The siege logic was immediate. Control the ridge line; deny the approaches; raid when possible. From Ithome, small parties slid down at dusk to burn wagon trains bound for Spartan posts near Stenyclerus or to seize a harvest patch beneath the mountain’s southern face. The smell of smoke drifted toward the Messenian Gulf; the sound of runners’ feet, light on stone, carried up to the gate [2].
Sparta encamped in the foothills. They posted detachments along the Pamisos, blocked the routes over Taygetus, and began the style of operations learned at Eira: accumulate small gains, hold your ground, trust that the mountain will tire before the city does. But Plutarch’s emphasis—“the greatest peril”—is telling [4]. The helotry’s sheer numbers, exposed starkly at Plataea by Herodotus’ seven-to-one ratio, formed a potential army concentrated on a stronghold [3]. The arithmetic frightened, and rightly.
The rebels’ geography widened their options. Ithome’s western slopes look out toward the Messenian Gulf and Pylos, where boats could slip in with supplies; its northern approaches tie into routes toward Elis and Arcadia, where sympathizers might offer grain or refuge. From Andania’s shrines to the Pamisos’ fords, the terrain was a web the Messenians knew with intimate precision [2].
Pausanias will later tell us that this stand-off ended not with storming ladders but with a truce. For now, the fortress lived. Fires burned on the summit at night; the azure sky blazed at noon; the siege line below shivered in winter rains. Athenians would soon appear and just as quickly be sent away. But the heart of the crisis throbbed here, on Ithome’s stone [2][9].
Thucydides, looking back, will explain Spartan behavior during and after such risings: test helots, crown the brave, then make them “disappear” when fear peaks [10]. That psychology encamped at Ithome too. Every Spartan commander who walked the perimeter could count, as Herodotus had at Plataea, not only citizen shields but the multitude beyond them—now inside a mountain fort.
Why This Matters
Fortifying Ithome turned a spasm of revolt into a sustained campaign. The choice forced Sparta to move from emergency relief in Laconia to a prolonged siege in Messenia, tying up troops and exposing the state’s reliance on a hostile labor base concentrated behind walls [2][4].
This chapter embodies “Mountain Redoubts and Protracted Sieges.” As with Eira, stone trades space for time. The rebels’ position also drew outside actors into the drama, because a long siege invites allies and meddlers. Ithome’s endurance created the diplomatic context for Athenian intervention—and Spartan suspicion [2][4][9].
In the broader narrative, Ithome is the pivot between domestic structure and interstate politics. The same helot numbers that sustained Spartan campaigns now threatened to warp Spartan alliances. What began as an internal containment problem curved into a Greek-wide alignment toward the First Peloponnesian War [2][9][20].
Sources align on the outline: Plutarch for peril and policy; Pausanias for place and truce; Herodotus for numbers; Thucydides for fear’s mechanisms. Together, they render Ithome both a stone and a symbol [2][3][4][10].
Event in Context
See what happened before and after this event in the timeline
People Involved
Key figures who played a role in Helots and Messenians Fortify Mount Ithome
Cimon
Cimon, son of Marathon’s victor Miltiades, rose as Athens’ leading commander of the 470s and 460s BCE, taking Eion and Scyros and winning the great victory at the Eurymedon. A conservative, he championed alliance with Sparta. When a devastating earthquake in 464 BCE triggered a helot and Messenian rising at Mount Ithome, Cimon led thousands of Athenian hoplites to aid Sparta—only to be dismissed for suspected “innovations.” The humiliation cracked the alliance and doomed his policy. In the Messenian Wars’ long arc, Cimon is the hinge: his failed mediation turned Spartan fear of helots into Athenian suspicion of Sparta.
Pausanias
Pausanias, the 2nd‑century CE traveler, wrote Description of Greece, a ten‑book tour of landscapes, sanctuaries, and stories. Wandering through refounded Messene and the shadow of Mount Ithome, he stitched local lore to monumental remains, preserving the saga of Aristomenes, the siege of Mount Eira, and the long Spartan domination. His pages are the principal thread connecting modern readers to the Messenian Wars’ human texture. In a conflict where Spartan fear and Messenian memory wrestled for centuries, Pausanias made memory legible.
Ask About This Event
Have questions about Helots and Messenians Fortify Mount Ithome? Get AI-powered insights based on the event details.