In 37 CE, Gaius—nicknamed Caligula—succeeded Tiberius, greeted with jubilation that boomed against the stone of the Forum. The great-grandson of Augustus and son of Germanicus embodied dynastic hope. Within months, the hopeful rhythm turned erratic, and Rome learned how quickly a princeps could exhaust goodwill [3][4][14].
What Happened
Tiberius died in 37 CE, leaving a legacy of stability, suspicion, and a carefully tended machine of rule. Into its cockpit stepped Gaius Julius Caesar Germanicus—Caligula, the little boots of his childhood among the legions. The Senate acclaimed him; the people cheered; the Praetorians smiled at a familiar name backed by their steel. Tacitus’ narrative is lost here, but Suetonius and Cassius Dio supply the arc: the rush of promise, the swirl of spectacle, the strain of governance [3][4][14].
The opening months glittered. Caligula gave donatives to the Guard and the populace, staged games, and brought back the bodies of his mother and brothers for burial in Augustus’ mausoleum, weaving himself into the founding story in marble and tears. The color of celebration—golden wreaths, purple garments—returned to the Campus Martius and Palatine. In coins and proclamations, the message was renewal [3][4].
Then the rhythm shifted. Ancient writers report illness, perhaps in the autumn, and a personality that turned from generous to grandiose. Dio recounts reorganization in Mauretania and interventions in cults; Suetonius layers court anecdotes that may be gossip but capture a changed atmosphere—extravagant building, expensive spectacles, and open friction with senators who remembered the quieter shades of Tiberius [3][4].
In the Curia, the scrape of styluses grew sharper. Caligula’s gestures, intended to awe, drained the treasury; his mockery of senatorial dignities pricked pride that had survived Augustus’ careful staging. The Guard watched. Crowds watched. The system, resilient under steady hands, became brittle when prodded without purpose [4][14].
By the end of 40 CE, the city had learned to read the signs: when the princeps’ moods direct policy, the sounds of governance—regular, predictable—dissolve into the sudden clatter of crisis. The next January, knives would answer gestures with steel [3][4].
Why This Matters
Caligula’s accession affirmed the power of dynastic branding. A Germanicus in the purple produced instant loyalty from soldiers and citizens. But the same mechanism that granted a honeymoon—adoption and lineage—could not guarantee temperament or policy. The post-Tiberian machine met a driver who loved its horn more than its brakes [3][4][14].
The event illuminates adoption-as-succession technology. It can deliver legitimacy, not necessarily competence. It also highlights the role of the Praetorians and Senate as barometers: their early cheers turned to cold calculation when expenditures rose and insults multiplied [3][4].
The way the reign began set up how it would end. A princeps who fused pageantry, provocation, and fiscal strain created the coalition—officers, courtiers, senators—that would assemble in a palace corridor in 41 CE. The little boots had entered to applause. He would not leave to it [3][4][14].
Event in Context
See what happened before and after this event in the timeline
People Involved
Key figures who played a role in Caligula becomes emperor
Ask About This Event
Have questions about Caligula becomes emperor? Get AI-powered insights based on the event details.