In 135 CE, Bethar—near Jerusalem—fell. Bar Kokhba died in the fighting, and with him the revolt’s hope [6][7]. The last stronghold’s silence, a short march from Aelia’s new stones, carried farther than any trumpet blast.
What Happened
As the net tightened, Bethar became the final knot. Situated southwest of Jerusalem, near the Roman roads to Emmaus and Lydda, it controlled access to routes that mattered more for meaning than movement: lines of sight to the mount where Jupiter’s temple rose. Severus could starve it. He did [6].
The siege lacked the theatrical machines of 70. There was no Antonia to lean from, no Temple to burn. There was a town with walls, a reservoir, and fighters led by a man whose coins named him prince. The sounds were granular: pick work at night on saps, watch calls changing Roman posts, the groan of a single ram dragged to a weak point. Inside, ration arguments and whispered prayers [6].
When the breach came, it was local and brutal. House-to-house fighting in streets that bent with the hill; courtyards turned to last redoubts; fires set to flush defenders from alleys. Bar Kokhba died here. Dio’s epitome tells the fact, not the scene. Eusebius places the fierce phase of the war in Hadrian’s 18th year and notes the catastrophe’s conclusion in bans and renamings that followed [6][7].
Bethar’s fall ended organized resistance. News carried to Caesarea by courier and to Antioch by official letter. In Aelia, not far away, surveyors and builders continued their work as the smoke of a Jewish stronghold rose into the same air. The proximity reads like a commentary: a colony’s stones and a revolt’s ashes in one horizon.
Why This Matters
The fall of Bethar decapitated the revolt and removed its last stronghold near the symbolic heart of the conflict—Jerusalem/Aelia. With Bar Kokhba dead, the rebel administration collapsed; letters ceased; coinage stopped. Rome moved from war to policy [6][7].
Within siegecraft and attrition, Bethar is the terminal point of a strategy that refused decisive battle and settled for decisive famine and isolation. The final assault was a foregone conclusion once the districts around Bethar had been sealed and starved [6].
The immediate political consequence was the freedom to refashion the province without fear of renewed siege. Eusebius’ note of bans and Dio’s numbers together frame the transition from attrition in the field to reconfiguration on the map and in the law [6][7].
Event in Context
See what happened before and after this event in the timeline
People Involved
Key figures who played a role in Fall of Betar (Bethar) and Death of Bar Kokhba
Sextus Julius Severus
Sextus Julius Severus was one of Hadrian’s most capable generals, recalled from governing Britain in 133 CE to end the Bar Kokhba revolt. He avoided pitched battles, instead isolating strongholds, starving caves, and stepwise reclaiming Judaea—tactics that culminated in Betar’s fall in 135. Ancient sources credit a grim tally: dozens of forts and hundreds of villages reduced, staggering casualties. In this timeline, Severus is the strategist who translated Hadrian’s will into method, proving how Rome’s machine could unmake a rebel state without a single decisive battle.
Shimon bar Kosiba (Bar Kokhba)
Shimon bar Kosiba—remembered as Bar Kokhba, “Son of the Star”—led the Jewish revolt of 132–135 CE against Hadrian. He forged a short-lived state, issuing coins reading “Shimon, Prince of Israel,” and ran an administration whose letters order lulavim and etrogim for Sukkot even amid war. Initially successful, he was ground down by Sextus Julius Severus’ war of attrition. Betar fell in 135 and Bar Kokhba died there. In this timeline, he is the revolt’s steel and symbol: the man who tried to defend a sacred center against Rome’s evolving machine.
Ask About This Event
Have questions about Fall of Betar (Bethar) and Death of Bar Kokhba? Get AI-powered insights based on the event details.