Aristotle’s Constitution of the Athenians documents choregoi selection
Around 330 BCE, Aristotle’s Constitution of the Athenians described how tribes nominated choregoi for the Dionysia—affirming the bureaucratic spine behind the music. Art ran on law, and law wrote it down [7][22].
What Happened
If the Poetics anatomized plays, Aristotle’s Constitution of the Athenians cataloged the city that staged them. Composed around 330 BCE, the treatise includes a passage that reads like a production cue: “Afterwards he receives the Chorus-leaders nominated by the Tribes for the men’s and boys’ competitions and the comedies at the Dionysia …” [7][22]. The line freezes administration in prose.
In practice, this meant that on the south slope of the Acropolis, choruses drilled to the aulos’ cry because, earlier, in the Agora’s shadow, a magistrate and tribes had made appointments. The archon’s calendar and tribal nominations converted wealth into rehearsals. The orchestra’s dust was, in this sense, a legal product.
Three sites triangulate the bureaucratic ballet: the theater precinct (execution), the archon’s office near the Agora (assignment), and the east slope of the Acropolis (commemoration via inscriptions and monuments). The city’s rhythms—procession, performance, inscription—rest on selection and enforcement.
The prose’s dryness is part of its power. It confirms that the citizens treated choregia not as philanthropic whim but as a norm bound to other liturgies like trierarchy and gymnasiarchy. Exemptions, challenges, and suits happened against a background of rule [24][25]. The clack of kleroteria in lawcourts, the rustle of lists, the careful cutting of letters on stone—these are the theater’s inaudible sounds.
The passage also reveals comedy’s equal administrative dignity: choregoi are nominated for comedies as well as for men’s and boys’ choruses. The jokes that bit at the Lenaia and City Dionysia were funded by law, not luck. That standing mattered as comedy later changed shape.
Readers in the Lyceum or in private homes heard confirmation that art had a constitution. The city’s ability to stage Aeschylus and Aristophanes depended on this machinery, which Aristotle’s treatise makes legible and, in its way, beautiful.
Why This Matters
The Constitution’s choregoi passage verifies the institutional underpinnings of Athenian drama. It shows that the city distributed obligations through tribes and magistrates, thereby creating a stable pipeline for cultural production [7][22]. Theater appears as governance in action.
This belongs to festival finance as statecraft. Legal and administrative clarity kept the festivals from depending on ad hoc generosity and ensured that honors and burdens circulated in predictable ways, subject to challenge and reform [24][25].
In the broader arc, the treatise records the skeleton that supported 5th‑century innovation and 4th‑century scale. As comedy shifts and Menander emerges, the same nomination mechanisms fund the new plots. Aristotle’s cool record-keeping complements his hot theory: one tells poets how to build, the other tells officials how to pay.
Historians rely on Ath. Pol. to calibrate what inscriptions suggest and what plays assume. It is the city’s backstage manual, durable as marble and as decisive as a judge’s pebble.
Event in Context
See what happened before and after this event in the timeline
People Involved
Key figures who played a role in Aristotle’s Constitution of the Athenians documents choregoi selection
Ask About This Event
Have questions about Aristotle’s Constitution of the Athenians documents choregoi selection? Get AI-powered insights based on the event details.