Back to Athenian Plague
political

Political Backlash: Pericles Fined and Temporarily Deposed

Date
-430
political

Amid the crisis of 430–429 BCE, Athenians punished Pericles for the crowding and the suffering behind the walls. Plutarch recalls a fine and a brief removal from office before his reelection. The Assembly’s patience ended before the plague did.

What Happened

Leadership in a plague is a contact sport. Pericles, architect of the Long Walls strategy, faced that truth as pyres crackled at the Kerameikos and coughs echoed beneath the Pnyx. Plutarch tells us Athenians turned on him, “fined him” and “deposed him” for a time, before recalling him when fury cooled and need returned [4].

The charges were not legal niceties but visceral blame. Pericles had “poured the rabble from the country into the walled city” and “penned [them] up like cattle,” Plutarch reports, putting scarred farmers from Acharnai under rooftops they did not trust [4]. In the Agora, where bronze decrees glinted, men asked whether strategy that avoided spears had invited fever.

In the Assembly on the Pnyx, the sound of oratory carried over a city gone hoarse. Pericles argued that abandoning the plan would invite Spartan victory—grain still entered at Piraeus; the fleet still ruled the azure Saronic Gulf. He wore no scarlet cloak, only the authority of consistency. But consistency could not bury the dead [16].

The censure did not last. The same public that punished him soon reelected him, soberly acknowledging that, absent a cure, no new general could conjure one. Thucydides’ narrative does not linger on the vote but records the fact of Pericles’ leadership into 429, when the plague reached his own house [1], [4].

Politics did not stop the coughs. It did record the city’s need to do something in the face of helplessness. The fine struck a man; the plague struck Athens.

Why This Matters

Pericles’ censure illuminates Authority Under Plague. When ritual and medicine failed, political legitimacy bore the brunt of public pain. Punishing and then recalling Pericles shows a democracy oscillating between anger and pragmatism—testing leaders for outcomes, then returning to the one with a plan when no alternative emerged [4].

This episode also clarifies that the strategy itself endured. Even as Pericles paid a fine, ships still loaded at Piraeus and Spartans still burned fields in Attica. The city’s structural choices persisted, which helps explain why contagion patterns and funerary breakdown continued into 428 and recurred in 427/6 [1], [2].

For historians, Plutarch’s anecdote complements Thucydides’ spare war chronicle by supplying civic mood and consequence. It ties social suffering at the Kerameikos and in crowded wards to real political acts—sanction, removal, reelection—that shaped how the city navigated the next campaign season [4], [16].

Ask About This Event

Have questions about Political Backlash: Pericles Fined and Temporarily Deposed? Get AI-powered insights based on the event details.

Answers are generated by AI based on the event content and may not be perfect.