Tried by an Athenian jury in 399 BCE, Socrates defended his mission in Plato’s Apology and was condemned to drink hemlock. He called himself a gadfly and declared the unexamined life not worth living, words that echoed off the Agora’s stoas even as the prison door shut [1][16].
What Happened
When the case reached trial in 399 BCE, the Agora’s noise narrowed into a jury’s time. Men sat on benches, swore oaths, and listened. Socrates stood to speak—no polished orator, as he insisted—just a citizen defending a practice that had annoyed Athens for decades. The courtroom’s wood smelled resinous; outside, bronze flashed in the sun [1][11][16].
In Plato’s Apology, he does not flatter his judges. He calls himself a gift of the god, a gadfly attached to a sluggish horse. He narrates his inquiries among politicians, poets, and craftsmen, explaining how each interview revealed ignorance where confidence sat. Then the sentence that has never lost its edge: “The unexamined life is not worth living for a human being.” It rang against stone like a hammer on a shield rim [1].
The city also heard the laughter of memory. Aristophanes’ Clouds had taught Athens to see Socrates as a sophist who dangled above sense and turned wrong into right. That color—comic indigo and scarlet from the Stoa Poikile’s panels—bled into the courtroom’s air. The jurors’ ears carried a decade of jokes and rumors along with the man’s living words [4][12].
He was convicted. The penalty phase followed. According to the rules, he proposed an alternative to death. He suggested free meals at the Prytaneion, a prize for benefactors of the city—a move that read as defiance. Fines were discussed; friends offered to pay. The jurors chose the hemlock [1][16].
The prison stood near the Agora, within walking distance of the stoas where he had questioned passersby. The room was small. The cup was brought. Plato’s Phaedo will later dwell on the last conversation; the Apology leaves us with the principle and the sting. He took the cup. The color of the brew was dull; the sound of the swallow was plain; the silence that followed cut louder than any speech [1][16].
His death did not end the questions. It made them multiply. His students, among them Plato and Xenophon, carried away a body of conversations and a problem: how to continue a life of examination in a city that had judged it intolerable. The door to the street still opened onto the Agora. But many now looked for a door that opened onto a school [3][19].
Why This Matters
The trial and execution changed philosophy’s venue. A practice that had lived fully in the open moved partly behind walls. Plato’s Academy institutionalized dialectic; Aristotle’s Lyceum systematized inquiry; Epicurus’ Garden and Zeno’s Stoa offered rival remedies for fear and fate. Socrates’ cup forced Athens’ thinkers to invent communities that could protect and transmit a way of life [19][18][17].
This event exemplifies Ethics as Lived Practice. The verdict weighed not just doctrines but a habit: questioning in public, exposing ignorance, urging virtue as a daily choice. The city judged a practice, and schools responded with practices of their own—curricula, meals, exercises—that made ethics durable [1].
For the broader story, the hemlock fixes the central question: how can philosophy survive and shape civic life without being crushed by it? The Academy brought mathematicians and dialecticians to a grove; the Stoa returned to the Agora with doctrines suited to withstand fortune’s blows. Both lines remember the courtroom’s wood and the cup’s taste [2][17][11].
Event in Context
See what happened before and after this event in the timeline
People Involved
Key figures who played a role in Trial and Execution of Socrates
Socrates
Socrates (469–399 BCE) walked the Athenian Agora barefoot, taking citizens and statesmen alike through relentless questions that exposed shaky assumptions and demanded clarity. A decorated hoplite and the son of a stonecutter and a midwife, he forged a new civic practice—elenchus, the testing-by-question—that treated conversation as a public good. Tried and executed in 399 BCE, he refused both exile and escape, choosing hemlock over silence. His death forced Athens to rethink how the examined life could survive democracy’s tempers, igniting the institutional turn: Plato’s Academy, Aristotle’s Lyceum, and, later, the Garden and the Stoa—all answers to the challenge Socrates posed in the sun: what life is worth living, and how do we protect it?
Plato
Plato (c. 428–347 BCE), born into an aristocratic Athenian family, turned the trauma of Socrates’ execution into a new civic form: the Academy (c. 387 BCE). He fused mathematics and dialectic, making number and argument the twin rails of philosophical training, and used his Republic as a pedagogical core. Across dialogues from the Apology to the Laws, he staged inquiry as drama and institution, aiming to protect philosophy from the city’s tempers without abandoning the city. In this timeline he is the first builder—transforming a street practice into a school sturdy enough to teach not only what to think, but how to live.
Ask About This Event
Have questions about Trial and Execution of Socrates? Get AI-powered insights based on the event details.