Back to Athenian Ostracism
military

Battle of Marathon as Prelude to Ostracism's First Use

Date
-490
military

In 490 BCE, Athens beat Persia at Marathon; two years later, Athenians finally used Cleisthenes’s still-idle law of ostracism. Victory brought swagger—and anxiety over powerful men—so the city reached for a ritual designed to restrain prominence before it curdled into domination [1][15].

What Happened

The runners came back from Marathon carrying triumph and fear in the same breath. Athens had thrown back Persia on the coastal plain north of the city, and the shock of victory rippled through the Pnyx and the Agora. Shields still hung drying in the sun, bronze catching a hard azure sky. The city’s leaders tasted new stature—and the danger that stature brings in a democracy [1][15].

Two years later, Aristotle tells us, Athenians reached for a tool they had not yet used: the law of ostracism. The statute, attributed to Cleisthenes, had sat dormant since 508/7. Marathon jolted the city into action. Athens had surged onto the Hellenic stage; with that surge came generals whose names filled the colonnades of the Stoa of Attalos and whose followers crowded the Assembly steps [1].

The sequence mattered. First, the Assembly in midwinter considered whether to hold an ostracism that year. Then, if approved, the citizens gathered in the Agora inside a fenced precinct and scratched a single name onto a potsherd. If fewer than 6,000 votes were cast, nothing happened. If the quorum was met, the man with the most votes had ten days to leave Attica for ten years, his property and citizenship preserved [2][15]. The sound of it—the steady scrape on clay, the clink of shards into baskets—announced a new kind of decision.

Marathon had offered a lesson in collective action. Ostracism offered a lesson in collective restraint. The places that defined Athenian politics—Marathon’s coastal plain, the Pnyx hill, the Agora’s open rectangle—now connected in a story about ambition and limits. The same demos that could sprint 26 miles behind a messenger could, in an afternoon, sideline a lion [2][15].

That first use would expel Hipparchus son of Charmus, an old-line figure with connections to the city’s pre-democratic past. It was a gentle blow—ten years in the countryside or abroad, income intact—but it was a blow all the same [1][2]. Marathon had shown Athens what it could do to empires. Ostracism would show Athens what it could do to its own.

In the Kerameikos, where the dead of Marathon would later be honored, archaeologists would find echoes of these decisions in heaps of ostraka from the decades that followed. Their red-brown surfaces, their clustered names, their occasional insults preserved the aftershocks of a victory that made ostracism feel necessary [8][11]. The law, at last, had a heartbeat.

Why This Matters

Marathon did not create ostracism, but it created the political climate for its first use. The victory elevated military leaders and intensified factional alignments, sharpening the need for a preventive mechanism that removed towering figures without criminalizing them [1][2][15]. Two years later, Athenians acted.

This episode clarifies the theme of a safety valve. The annual two-step ballot—first to decide whether to hold an ostracism, then to name the target—suits a polity oscillating between fear and pride. The 6,000-vote quorum and ten-year term ensured a heavy but reversible check that matched democratic confidence with caution [2][15].

Within the larger arc, Marathon-to-ostracism connects foreign war to domestic procedure. The same demos that could defeat Persia could also discipline its own heroes, channeling potentially destabilizing acclaim into an orderly ritual. Later ostracisms—Aristides in 482, Themistocles around 471, Cimon in 461—follow this template of wartime reputation meeting peacetime anxiety [2][11][18].

For historians, the timing illuminates cause and effect. Aristotle’s note about the post-Marathon first use anchors ostracism in a concrete moment of democratic consolidation under stress, enriching debates about why Athens reached for this tool and why it remained intermittent [1][10][15].

Event in Context

See what happened before and after this event in the timeline

Earlier Events
Later Events

Ask About This Event

Have questions about Battle of Marathon as Prelude to Ostracism's First Use? Get AI-powered insights based on the event details.

Answers are generated by AI based on the event content and may not be perfect.